Full reportA paid layer that feels premium because it is narrower, clearer, and more structured.
The first product does not need to become a bloated membership. It needs one strong personal report, one clean compatibility upgrade, and timing logic that remains native to BaZi.
Personal BaZi reading
The first paid layer turns the free memory point into a readable system: structure, timing, relationship pressure, and solar-term cadence. This is the early-access price while the library is still being expanded.
- Personal structure map across daymaster, Ten Gods, five phases, and useful-force pressure
- Luck-pillar timeline with five visible decade shifts and the logic inside each turn
- Relationship structure framing that feels specific without pretending to be absolute fate
- Solar-term aware timing notes for Li Chun, yearly handoffs, and phase-sensitive windows
Card checkout runs in-place. PayPal remains available as a fallback for every product.
Compatibility expansion
Start with one person, then invite a second chart into the system. The upgrade should explain chemistry, mismatch, pressure, and timing without flattening both people into one score.
- Attraction and friction patterns between two charts
- Where communication, pacing, or attachment style naturally misaligns
- Which moving years intensify the connection or expose instability
- A share loop that feels like relationship insight, not a gimmick
Card checkout for this add-on will go live after the dedicated price is created.
Card checkout runs in-place. PayPal remains available as a fallback for every product.
What the paid layer should make legible
Structure before storytelling
The report starts from rules, not freestyle language. Users should be able to see why a conclusion appears and where the evidence sits.
Timing across multiple scales
Personal timing combines decade pillars, moving years, and solar-term rhythm instead of one generic monthly calendar.
Relationship language that stays adult
The tone should feel sharp, intimate, and culturally grounded without collapsing into prophecy theater or generic self-help.
What the first paid version is and is not
It should include
- A report that feels finished enough to save and revisit
- A methodology page users can actually trust
- A compatibility route that builds on the first reading instead of replacing it
It should not include
- A fake subscription loop with made-up weekly forecasts
- Generic AI prose that invents chart structure to sound mystical
- An oversized feature list that makes the first payment feel ambiguous
Questions the page should answer before checkout
Why not start with a subscription?
Because trust is low on day one. A strong one-time report is easier to understand, easier to buy, and easier to recommend.
Why keep compatibility as an add-on?
Compatibility needs two people, which means higher friction. Let the first personal reading earn enough trust before asking for a second chart.
What happens when a chart is structurally balanced?
The paid layer leans harder on timing, moving years, and relationship activation instead of forcing a dramatic static reading.
The premium version should feel quiet, expensive, and trustworthy.
That comes from structure, editorial restraint, and timing depth, not from turning every page into a louder promise.